Central
Argument: Abortion should be something that the women should choose, as it has
got the ability to prevent pain and unhappiness from some lives at the same
time brings pain and sorrow in someone’s life.
Abortion,
a deliberate termination of the baby has now been legalized in different parts
of the World now. Rick
Santorum, meet my son by Emily Rapp is a true story in where Rapp’s child has got
Tay-Sachs, a genetic disorder which possibly would kill the little child. Rapp
regrets for giving life to Ronan, her son, rather than death in the first few
weeks of his life. This type of killing would have been an “act of
love.”(Rapp), is
something that Rapp as a loving mother’s heart said about her own child.
“Two years old,
he is already blind, paralyzed, and increasingly non-responsive” (Rapp), would some mother want a child
to be two and paralyzed, suffering from many other stuff? Or would a mother
just be ideal to terminate the baby even before, the baby could feel something?
I think the ideal situation in this case would be like Rapp’s own feelings. I
personally think that the baby would have been better off without a painful
life in this earth.
“You
should see how beautiful he is; you should see how he suffers, how his parents
suffer.” (Rapp) This shows
how much she adores her son yet wants and has regretted about something that
would have been the best for her son Ronan. She is in pain just by seeing her own son suffering
extremely. I have seen a mother who went through tough time seeing her son suffer
and finally leave her suffering son after two years of his life. And the pain
just seems to be unbearable.
Likewise, not having the chance to abort Rapp’s baby left both the
parents suffering along with the child. “Intense suffering, knowing that
his neurologically devastated brain made true quality of life.”(Rapp) Has this situation made Rapp
happy with her life? Not at all neither has is made anything happy for Ronan
himself. If Rapp had decided to have an abortion almost three years back then,
it would not have been the same, both the parent’s and the child’s life would
have been much more easier. “Do I wish my child wouldn't suffer, that it
would have been better for him to have never been born than to watch him
struggle to breathe? To know that he will never speak, walk, chew solid food,
toddle, or move? Yes. One statement doesn’t cancel out the other.” (rapp) This shows the remedy of her
not aborting her child. It would have been much simpler if she had terminated
Ronan’s life.
The
choice that Rapp made about giving life to her son has left him be paralyzed,
slow, blind and abnormal in many other ways, and that led to misery in the
lives of Ronan’s mom and dad because of the suffering that their precious baby
has been going through.
Your essays are mostly summary, not response. You reveal some interesting opinions but provide no evidence. Keep this formula in mind for this kind of essay:
ReplyDeletePerson A believes B. I agree/disagree for reasons X, Y, and Z.